What was the matter of tension between French and Dutch speaking communities during 1950s and 1960s?

Why was there an acute problem in Brussels during 1950s and 1960s between the two communities?

What led to the tension between Dutch and French speaking communities in 1950 and 1960?

(i) The issues of ‘majoritarianism’ and financial preference led to the tensions between the Dutch speaking and French speaking communities in Belgium during 1950s and 1960s.

What were the reasons for conflict between the Dutch speaking and French speaking community in Belgium?

(i) The minority French-speaking community was moderately wealthy and capable. This was resented by the Dutch community. (ii) The Dutch community got the advantage of financial improvement and education. This paved way to a tension between the Dutch-speaking and French communities amid the 1950s and 1960s.

IT IS INTERESTING:  What is an example of a Holland code?

What was the special problems of Dutch speaking in Belgium?

Brussels, the capital of Belgium presented a special problem: the Dutch-speaking people constituted a majority in the country, but a minority in the capital. In Brussels, 80% of the population spoke French while 20% were Dutch-speaking.

Which community was rich and powerful in Belgium?

French community was rich and powerful in Belgium. The minority community which was relatively rich and powerful in Belgium were the French. The French speakers got the advantage of development in economic area because of many reasons. The French people were educated as well as qualified.

What led to tension between Dutch and French Mcq?

The majority Dutch-speaking community was richer and more powerful than the minority French-speaking community. Both the communities were equal in socio economic ladder and this was resented by the French-speaking community.

Why was the tension between the French speaking and Dutch speaking communities more acute in Brussels Class 10?

the tension was more acute in brussels because it created a special problem which is that the dutch speaking people constituted a majority in the country , but a minority in the capital.

What made resentment to the Dutch speaking community?

The minority French-speaking community was relatively rich and powerful. This was resented by the Dutch-speaking community who got the benefit of economic development and education much later. This led to tension between the Dutch speaking and French-speaking communities during the 1950s-60s.

Why was the tension between the two communities French and Dutch more acute in Brussels?

This tension between the two communities was more acute in Brussels. It was so, because, the Dutch-speaking people constituted majority in the country, but minority in the capital, i.e. Brussels.

IT IS INTERESTING:  Your question: Is it cold in Amsterdam in March?

How was the conflict between the two communities resolved in Belgium?

Belgians resolved the ethnic conflict between 1970 and 1993, as they amended their Constitution four times, to work out an arrangement that would enable everyone to live together within the same country.

What were the two main reasons of resentment in Belgium in 1960 how was the conflict resolved?

The conflict was solved through an agreement that dutch should also have the same no. Of people and powers in the center. The Dutch-speaking community and the French-speaking community were separated by economic inequality. Due to this there was always issues between the two communities.

Why is Belgium complex ethnic?

The Ethnic Composition of the small country like Belgium is very complex because of various languages speaking people like: (i) Of the country’s total population, 59 per cent lives in the Flemish region and speak Dutch language. (ii) Another 40 per cent live in the “Wallonia region” and speak French.